← All Unit 4 readings

Unit 4 · Learning Theory · Reading 5 of 13

Built-In Shortcuts: Taste Aversion and Higher-Order Conditioning

Read before: Day 2Time: about 6 minutesTextbook: Ch. 6, taste aversions through higher-order conditioning

Before you read

Is there a food you won't eat because it once made you sick? How many times did it take before you started avoiding it?

Words you'll own by the end

  • Conditioned taste aversion: a learned dislike of a food linked to getting sick.
  • John Garcia: the researcher most associated with taste aversions.
  • Biological preparedness: being built to learn some associations faster than others, because they help us survive.
  • Higher-order (second-order) conditioning: a CS is paired with a new neutral stimulus, which then becomes a CS too.

1. Taste aversion breaks the rules

Classical conditioning also happens outside the lab. Say you eat fried clams at lunch. You've caught a virus, but it hasn't hit yet. At 6 p.m. you start vomiting. Even though the virus made you sick, your brain links the illness to the clams. Now just seeing fried clams makes you feel queasy. That's a conditioned taste aversion.

Taste aversions are unusual in two ways:

Also notice the UCR and CR are different here. The UCR is vomiting. The CR is feeling nauseated. You probably won't actually throw up at the sight of clams.

Try it: Label the fried clams example

Use the five parts from Reading 2.

2. Why we're built this way

John Garcia is the researcher most associated with taste aversion. He and others argued it shows biological preparedness: we're predisposed to make certain connections quickly because they help us survive. If one bad meal can teach you to avoid a food for years, you're less likely to poison yourself twice.

Preparedness may also explain why phobias of snakes and heights are far more common than phobias of books or bicycles. Snakes and heights threatened our ancestors' survival; books never did.

Check-in: Why is a phobia of snakes more common than a phobia of bicycles?

3. Higher-order conditioning

Once a CS is learned, it can be used to teach a new CS. Say Pavlov's dogs already drool at the metronome. Now flash a red light right before the metronome, many times, with no food at all. Eventually the dogs drool at the red light alone. That's second-order or higher-order conditioning.

The red light was never paired with food, only with the metronome. Second-order conditioning is usually weaker and takes more pairings.

First-order vs. second-order

First order

NSMetronome+UCSFood→UCRSalivation
CSMetronome→CRSalivation

Second order

NSRed light+old CSMetronome→CRSalivation
new CSRed light→CRSalivation

The metronome takes the place of the food. No food is involved in this stage.

Check-in: A dog already drools at the sound of the can opener. The owner always opens the creaky pantry door right before using the can opener. Now the dog drools at the creak alone. What is this?

Am I ready for a pop quiz?

Check a box only if you can say the answer out loud without scrolling up.

Come back to your "before you read" question

Your food: did it take one bad experience? Did hours pass between eating it and feeling sick? If so, you lived Garcia's research.